…according to Typealyzer, anyway, which says that INTPs are:
“The logical and analytical type. They are espescially attuned to difficult creative and intellectual challenges and always look for something more complex to dig into. They are great at finding subtle connections between things and imagining far-reaching implications.
They enjoy working with complex things using a lot of concepts and imaginative models of reality. Since they are not very good at seeing and understanding the needs of other people, they might come across as arrogant, impatient and insensitive to people that need some time to understand what they are talking about.”
Most of that applies to me as well as my blog. Especially the “…finding subtle connections between things and imagining far-reaching implications” bit. I seem to be doing that all the time, and I really need to get myself into a position where it works to my advantage, rather than against it. The problem at the moment is that every new idea or insight is just another distraction keeping me from doing all the things people are expecting me to do (or, depending on the time of day, getting to sleep that night).
The initials INTP refer to Introverted, iNtuitive, Thinking, Perceiving, and INTP is one of the 16 Meyer Briggs Type Identifiers (MBTI).
The last time I seriously looked into MBTI, maybe 4-5 years ago, I thought I was borderline INTP/INTJ. But after recently spotting Typealyzer (via Stowe), I started digging into MBTI again, and now it seems to me I’m well to the Percieving side of the INTJ/INTP divide. (eg, one classic INTP trait is to ignore the humongous to-do list and focus on understanding whatever currently has their attention, which in this case, is MBTI theory)
The Judging type, apparently, like to come to conclusions and move on, while the Perceiving type tend to suspend decisions until they have more information. If you could see my web-history and todo list, I’m sure you’d agree I’m a very P-type thinker.
Fortunately, Karl is very much on the J side of the spectrum, or Interclue never would have had a prayer. And perhaps with a little more self-knowledge and self-awareness I’ll be able to get more done in 2009.
Has anyone else tried Typealyzer? Did your blog’s personality match your own personality?
Oh, and Happy New Year everyone! May it bring great reward to us all, despite the, er, ominous signs and portents.
To quote from “Looking at type: The Fundamentals” Martin, C. (1997), I have some resonance with just about every part of this INTP description, but particularly those parts that I’ve emphasized.
INTP: Introverted Thinking with Extraverted Intuition
For INTPs the driving force in their lives is to understand whatever phenomenon is the focus of their attention. They want to make sense of the world as a concept and they often enjoy opportunities to be creative.
INTPs are logical, analytical, and detached in their approach to the world; they naturally question and critique ideas and events as they strive for understanding. INTPs usually have little need to control the outer world, or to bring order to it, and they often appear very flexible and adaptable in their lifestyle. Logic and analysis are paramount for INTPs. They have a drive to analyze, to understand, and to make sense of ideas and events; things simply must make sense, and they should.
In fact, their internal juggling of ideas almost has a life of its own. INTPs think naturally in terms of cause and effect and logical consequences. They look for the underlying principles that explain the nature of the world or for the principles that capture the essence of their area of interest; INTPs enjoy solving complex problems. INTPs are naturally skeptical and critical. They question, question, and question some more. As a result, they may appear to others to be challenging, though they do not intend to criticize others. Because they value precision, INTPs are simply looking for logical inconsistencies in writing, speech, thought, and ideas. Exactness in definitions is of great importance to them, and without restraint they may engage in unnecessary hairsplitting.
INTPs may also have dramatic powers of concentration, and in using these they may develop an amazingly deep and complex understanding of some area(s) of interest. In fact, they may become so involved in the inner world and in their subject of interest that they may forget about the passage of time.
Intuition orients the INTP’s thinking to the future, and to the abstract and symbolic, but intuition is always subordinate to the need to analyze and understand ideas and events. New ideas and new ways of doing things fascinate INTPs. In fact, they are infinitely curious: about ideas, books, systems of thought, computers, or any other current area of interest. They may use their logic and intuition to develop new and highly intricate systems of thought, and thus they can be brilliant and innovative thinkers. INTPs are organizers in the world of abstract ideas; they view things systemically and creatively. They want the freedom to pursue their ideas in their own way, and thus they seek variety and independence in their lives. INTPs may have scientific, theoretical, or artistic interests, and can be found in computer, physical, or social sciences. They may be teachers, researchers, or thinkers in any field in which abstract and complex thought is required, as in philosophy. For INTPs, experience provides data, and the data is then analyzed for its fit into the complex mental models that they have been developing, possibly over a lifetime. The model is often more important than the experience itself, and INTPs are usually more interested in understanding and solving abstract problems than in the actual application of their ideas. They need to find a career where a deep and intensive understanding of some subject is important.
INTPs are often nontraditional. Their questioning attitude and need for autonomy may even lead to their being or appearing iconoclastic. They do, however, value intelligence and prize competence. INTPs give respect to others based on others’ perceived competence and depth of understanding rather than on the basis of position or external trappings of power. This is a natural extension of their strong valuing of autonomy. They are usually tolerant and adaptable and give other people wide leeway of behavior, feeling little need to control others. However, when the INTP’s principles (which may not be immediately apparent) are violated, he or she can be seen as very firm, even stubborn. INTPs are usually more interested in ideas and concepts than in people, though people may certainly be the subject of their acute thinking and analysis. A consequence of this detached and analytical orientation is that INTPs may miss interpersonal nuances, not appreciate the need for social niceties, and end up in hot water as a result. They can appear reserved and impersonal; though they do usually enjoy discussions with other people who share their own keen interest in ideas. Additionally, INTPs may be insensitive to the emotional needs of others and others may see them as aloof or unapproachable. At worst they may be or appear to be arrogant and critical.
Without development of their extraverted intuition, INTPs may remain aloof and incomprehensible, unable to work out or apply their ideas in the outside world. Development of their intuition will also help them take in information that can be processed using their logical thinking. Without that development, INTPs may become entangled in the inner world of logical thoughts and systems, and become too distant from the outer world of people and action. As a result, they may become certain of the truth of their logic, but be unwilling to check whether their “truths” apply to what is really happening in the world outside of their own minds. By attending only to what is logical, INTPs may also forget to attend to what is important to them as people. They may at times be weak on follow-through and self-direction, and they may even forget to attend to the details of everyday life.
Appropriate development of sensing and feeling will help them avoid these traps as well as help them give greater attention to interpersonal issues. Under stress, INTPs may feel overwhelmed and misunderstood. However, because they are so adaptable they may remain in a situation rather than leave it or negotiate a change. They may also feel confused when people in general or significant others don’t behave “logically.” INTPs need to understand that relationships have a logic of their own that the INTP may neglect to register as valid or important. Under great stress, and in contrast to their usual calm cool style, they may erupt with out-of-proportion expressions of emotion, particularly in response to relationship stresses.
[edited Jan 4: Added cut and moved text below here to above the cut. ]



5 comments ↓
well, that sounds like you and a bit like me (when I feel lazy and ignore the social cues even though I can read them) but it marks my blog in a way that would have me howling with laughter if I didn’t have a stomach ache
ESTP – The Doers
The active and playful type. They are especially attuned to people and things around them and often full of energy, talking, joking and engaging in physical out-door activities.
The Doers are happiest with action-filled work which craves their full attention and focus. They might be very impulsive and more keen on starting something new than following it through. They might have a problem with sitting still or remaining inactive for any period of time.
Er; I still still and work *all* day and I have trouble stopping a project to start a new one. And physical outdoor activities? The main one for me is flying!
Hi Seth,
I think you need to read up about the “Forer effect” to get an idea of whether the MBTI actually works. Have a read of it here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forer_effect
Cheers
Craig
Hi Craig, well I guess *something* has to explain why people believe in Astrology. But I find the general principles behind MBTI vastly more persuasive. It makes no sense at all that our temperament should be determined by our birth month, but it makes rather a lot of sense that people will favour either “judging” or “perceiving” (making decisions vs gathering more data), and as a result P’s will tend to exhibit different personality traits vs the J’s. Equally, it makes sense that one either mainly focuses on what is coming in from the senses (S), or blocks that out and tries to think in more abstract terms (N). Obviously people can be focused one way or another at any given time, but I found it enlightening to discover that there are many more people out there who favor S over N, because frankly, that explains a *lot*. I also like the way MBTI explains how the different types are likely to interract. On the whole it strikes me as a powerful and potentially useful theory.
Mary, I think matching up people’s blogs with their personalities is always going to be a process fraught with error! I suspect that your being a professional journalist, and therefore perhaps not writing in a style that would be natural to your type, would have a strong effect on the results.
According to “The Simpsons” Briggs Meyer test, you are the same as Professor Frink.
http://images.iceve.multiply.com/attachment/0/SMd9AgoKCDUAAD8XNlA1/SimpsonspersonalitytypesJPB%20(2).pps?nmid=114773932
Leave a Comment