<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 3.0? Are they kidding?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sethop.com/2007/04/11/web-30-are-they-kidding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sethop.com/2007/04/11/web-30-are-they-kidding/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:32:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethop</title>
		<link>http://sethop.com/2007/04/11/web-30-are-they-kidding/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>sethop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethop.com/2007/04/11/web-30-are-they-kidding/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Sumitra.

I did read his definition, I think I read almost everything that comes across R/WW, but I didn&#039;t find it compelling. Sure, all of those things are going to happen. Interclue is going to be part of it (we&#039;re all over that 4th C, &quot;Context&quot;) but why should it just be those things that define the next tipping point? 

After all there&#039;s so much other stuff happening as well, as I indicated above. 

Something I forgot to mention was the *design* factors - now that would be an interesting conversation - what elements will be the &quot;Fades and mirror effects&quot; of Web3.0? How will the evolving canvas, SVG, etc, standards play a part in this? I wouldn&#039;t have a clue myself - not my area of expertise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Sumitra.</p>
<p>I did read his definition, I think I read almost everything that comes across R/WW, but I didn&#8217;t find it compelling. Sure, all of those things are going to happen. Interclue is going to be part of it (we&#8217;re all over that 4th C, &#8220;Context&#8221;) but why should it just be those things that define the next tipping point? </p>
<p>After all there&#8217;s so much other stuff happening as well, as I indicated above. </p>
<p>Something I forgot to mention was the *design* factors &#8211; now that would be an interesting conversation &#8211; what elements will be the &#8220;Fades and mirror effects&#8221; of Web3.0? How will the evolving canvas, SVG, etc, standards play a part in this? I wouldn&#8217;t have a clue myself &#8211; not my area of expertise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumitra</title>
		<link>http://sethop.com/2007/04/11/web-30-are-they-kidding/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumitra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethop.com/2007/04/11/web-30-are-they-kidding/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Seth, even I read their definitions, very interesting! Check this compelling definition by Sramana Mitra. &lt;a href=&quot;http://sramanamitra.com/blog/572&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Web 3.0 = (4C + P + VS)&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth, even I read their definitions, very interesting! Check this compelling definition by Sramana Mitra. <a href="http://sramanamitra.com/blog/572" rel="nofollow">Web 3.0 = (4C + P + VS)</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

